Is It Cheaper To Rent Or To Buy? The Map

Posted

In many cities around the U.S., it’s becoming cheaper to buy than to rent, according to a new rent vs. buy map put out by the real estate listing website Trulia.com.

Top Cities Where Trulia Found That Buying Is A Value:

Las Vegas, Nev.; Miami, Fla.; Arlington, Tex.; Phoenix, Ariz.; Mesa, Ariz., and Jacksonville, Fla. In Vegas, a foreclosure rate of more than 1% has helped potential buyers by pushing bargain-price foreclosed homes on the market. Next in terms of affordability were Sacramento, Calif.; El Paso, Tex.; Fresno, Calif.; San Antonio, Tex., and Baltimore, Md.

How The Results Were Calculated.

The report used one general calculation to rank the cities: What is the average listing price of a two-bedroom home to buy divided by the average annual cost of a two-bedroom home to rent? In Baltimore, for example, Trulia’s average home listing price is around $150,000. But the average rental price is only a smidge over $1,000 a month – giving Baltimore a “12” on the rent/buy chart.

Map from Trulia.com on whether to rent or buyWhere “Renting Is Less Expensive, But Buying Might Be Better.”

Chicago, Houston, Washington, D.C. and Philadelphia all fell into that category. Of course, there are a lot of factors to weigh when you think about renting versus owning. Since home prices are held up by jobs, if you’re buying, you should first look at the jobs picture in those markets. It’s especially good in Washington, D.C., which has an enviable 6% unemployment rate.

Cities Where Renting Is Clearly The Better Option.

Consider the most expensive cities, where the rent vs. buy ratio is strictly in favor of renting: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Memphis, Kansas City, and Seattle. New York City, meanwhile, is a hyper-expensive class of its own, with a rent/buy ratio of 31.

Why New York City Is Such A Huge Outlier.

Part of the problem, I think, is an inventory mismatch. A large share of New York City housing stock – especially in the borough of Manhattan – consists of co-op apartments that have very restrictive sublet policies. (My co-op building, for example, doesn’t allow subletting at all). If those apartments, which are generally nice, could be listed for rent, then they’d raise the average rental price – and buy vs. rent would look a whole lot better.

In other words, I think the Big Apple market is more affordable than it looks. Certainly the New York City market is stable in terms of foreclosures, which are so minimal that Trulia lists the rate as “0%.”

 

  • HL

    Take this map with a grain of salt. In my city, Trulia’s “average rental price” is about right for a studio or one-bedroom apartment in a decent area, but the “average purchase price” would probably get you a townhouse in a REALLY BAD area, or maybe a studio in an up-and-coming area. Either way, it’s not comparing apples to apples. For example, I rent a one-bedroom in a desirable area for $1400/mo, including most utilities (they’re part of the condo fee, which is absorbed into the amount of rent we pay), which is at the high end of the average rental price according to the map; comparable apartments in my building sell for about $319K, plus there are condo fees each month, which is $119K HIGHER than the high end of average on the map.nnIn short, I just don’t believe what this graphic says.

  • AV

    A couple of things that Trulia isn’t accounting for: homeowner’s insurance and taxes. The list prices in Miami might be great, but you have to have a crazy high downpayment, cash buyers abound, property taxes are high, and homeowner’s insurance is INSANE… I’m sticking with renting!